Tax, Trusts & Estates Law Monitor : Estate Planning Lawyer & Attorney : Cole Schotz Meisel Forman & Leonard Law Firm : NJ, Mid-Atlantic Gift Tax & Trust Issues

It is official. President Obama signed into law Friday the “Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Authorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010.” The law removes (for now) a good deal of the uncertainty that existed with the repeal of the estate tax in 2010 and a return in 2011 to the estate and gift tax exemptions and rates of 2001.

The major gift, estate and generation-skipping tax provisions of the Act are as follows:

• Beginning January 1, 2011, the estate, gift and generation-skipping tax exemption is $5 million per taxpayer ($10 million per couple) and the tax rate is 35% (beginning in 2010).
• The estate tax exemption for a deceased spouse is portable, meaning the surviving spouse can use the unused estate tax exemption of the “last deceased spouse.”
• The lifetime gift tax exemption increases from $1 million to $5 million, meaning the gift tax exemption is unified with the estate tax exemption. This presents many planning opportunities for taxpayers to transfer significantly more wealth during their lifetimes without paying gift tax.
• Two year GRATs are still permitted.
• For decedents dying in 2010, executors have a choice. The default rule is that the estate tax regime applies at a 35% rate and a $5 million estate tax exemption. The executor can opt out of the estate tax regime and opt for the carry-over basis regime. The due date for the estate tax return and/or the return reporting carry-over basis is now nine months following date of the enactment of the Act (September 17, 2011), and not nine months from the date of death.
• The rates and exemptions are temporary and apply only in 2011 and 2012, at which time the law will need to be revisited again.
   

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

There has been a flurry of activity in the estate tax arena in the past few days and we wanted to keep readers updated. The first item was Senator Baucus’s (D-Montana) new estate tax proposal introduced on December 2, which, in summary, would have reinstated the estate tax at 2009 levels, meaning a $3.5 million exemption amount ($7 million per couple) and a 45% estate tax rate. This piece of his proposed legislation provided for an effective date of January 1, 2010, but would have allowed 2010 estates to elect to choose the no estate tax and modified carry-over basis regime that is currently in place for 2010. Other interesting items from Senator Baucus’s proposal included the lifetime gift exemption increasing to $3.5 million (effective on the date of the introduction of his bill, or December 2, 2010) and a minimum 10 year term for GRATs, with the GRAT remainder interest required to have a value greater than zero (effective on the date of enactment of the legislation). This legislation was voted down in the Senate on December 4.

Senator Baucus’s proposal was overshadowed on Monday by President Obama announcing his compromise with Republicans on the extension of the Bush tax cuts. Along with an agreement to keep the top income tax rate at 35% for all taxpayers for an additional two years, with regard to the estate tax, President Obama announced for two years, beginning in 2011, the estate tax rate would be 35% and the exemption per taxpayer would be $5 million.

Yesterday, House Democrats voted not to introduce President Obama’s tax plan for debate, in a move to negotiate some of the components of his plan. Thus, at this time, it is unclear what the components of new tax legislation (if any) will be. If no law is enacted, beginning January 1, 2011, the estate tax rate would be 55% with a $1 million exemption per taxpayer.

We will keep you updated as developments occur.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Two quick updates as we head into December and the last month of the 2010 Estate Tax Repeal:

1. 2011 Annual Gift Tax Exclusion to Remain the Same at $13,000. In 2010, the annual gift tax exclusion permits a taxpayer to gift $13,000 to any beneficiary, annually, even if the taxpayer has used up his or her $1 million lifetime gift exclusion. The 1997 Tax Reform Act tied the annual exclusion amount to increases in the CPI Index, and as a result, the annual exclusion has increased from $10,000 in 1997 to $13,000 currently. Due to a lack of significant inflation in 2010, the maximum gift tax annual exclusion in 2011 will remain at $13,000. This should also serve as a reminder that there is approximately one month left to take advantage of your 2010 annual exclusion gifts.
2. December AFRs even lower than historically low November AFRs. The December Applicable Federal Rates were just released, with the “7520 rate” falling to 1.8% from 2% in November. With such low rates, techniques such as GRATs and Sales to Grantor Trusts are even more attractive due to the low amount of interest that needs to be paid back to the taxpayer as a result of the transfers made by the taxpayer.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

One of the lesser known components of the 2010 estate tax repeal is that the gift tax rate in 2010 is 35%, as opposed to the 45% gift and estate tax rate that was in place in 2009. This presents a planning opportunity for a taxpayer to reduce his taxable estate and save a significant amount of taxes if the taxpayer believes that his estate will be subject to an estate tax in the future.

Absent new legislation, the 2010 estate tax repeal will sunset in 2011, with the estate tax reinstituted at rates as high as 55% and an exclusion amount equal to $1 million (adjusted for inflation). Gifts in excess of $1 million also will be subject to gift tax at rates as high as 55%. Thus, gifting assets in 2010 at a lower rate will ultimately transfer significantly more wealth to a taxpayer’s beneficiaries.

Assume that a taxpayer desires to gift $10 million to his children and has used his lifetime gift exclusion. In 2010, the gift tax on this gift, payable at a 35% rate, would be $3.5 million. Taxpayer would pay the gift tax so the total outlay for the taxpayer to get $10 million to his beneficiaries would be equal to $13.5 million. Assuming that the taxpayer survives three years from the date of the gift, the amount of the gift tax paid will not be included in taxpayer’s estate.

Now assume that the same taxpayer does not make the gift in 2010, and dies with $13.5 million in his estate in a year where the maximum estate tax rate is 55% (and said taxpayer also has used his full exclusion amount). The amount of estate tax due on the $13.5 million included in the taxpayer’s estate would be approximately $7.5 million, leaving approximately $6 million to pass to the taxpayer’s beneficiaries. On these facts, the 2010 gift of $10 million increases the net amount passing to taxpayer’s beneficiaries by almost $4 million.

The lower gift tax rate combined with the fact that the gift tax paid is not subject to estate tax (assuming taxpayer survives three years from the date of the gift) can produce dramatic savings for taxpayers inclined to make gifts in 2010 and pay gift tax.

Even more dramatic savings can be achieved in 2010 if the taxpayer’s beneficiaries are grandchildren. Due to the fact that the generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax is repealed in 2010, a gift in 2010 to grandchildren will not trigger a GST tax. If the same taxpayer dies in future years leaving these assets to grandchildren, the assets will be subject to both estate tax and a significant GST tax (up to 55%), further diminishing the amount ultimately passing to grandchildren.

There are less than three months remaining (assuming no retroactive application of new gift and estate tax laws) to implement this planning.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

Attached is an article from Tuesday’s New York Times, which details the story of Dan L. Duncan, a Texas billionaire, who died in March 2010, and as a result of the 2010 federal estate tax repeal, will be able to pass his multi-billion dollar fortune to his family estate and generation-skipping tax free. This is the type of story that may trigger a strong reaction from Congress to not only finally move on estate tax legislation, but potentially retroactively apply it.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

We wanted to continue to update you on new developments over the past few months in matters related to the estate tax.

• Despite reports stating that an estate tax deal was imminent, on May 18, Senate negotiators said that an agreement regarding estate taxes was on the verge of collapse after a majority of the Democratic caucus expressed concerns about voting for an expensive tax cut for wealthy families. Senate Finance Commissioner Max Baucus (D-Mont.) said “there is no agreement on the estate tax in either substance or process. None whatsoever.” Lobbyists said they believed the deal would have resulted in a top tax rate of 35 percent with a $5 million exemption level for individuals ($10 million for couples), with both figures indexed for inflation. They also believed it would have eliminated the chances of a retroactive estate tax increase.

• We previously wrote about bills being filed in both the Florida House and Senate in February, 2010 to impose a Florida estate tax on non-residents who own real or personal property in Florida and who reside in states that tax Florida residents who own property in those states. If enacted, the law would have been effective July 1, 2010. Both bills died in committee on April 30.

• In New York, an amended version of a bill was recently introduced to amend the estates, powers and trusts law to deal with certain formula clauses in Wills and trusts for estates of decedents dying in 2010. The amended bill provides, in essence, that for decedents dying in 2010, a formula clause in a dispositive instrument providing for a bequest of the maximum amount that can pass free of federal estate or GST taxes, shall be construed with respect to the law in effect for decedents dying on December 31, 2009. While we encourage all clients to review their planning documents in light of repeal, this bill could serve as a backstop for those clients who have documents drafted with formula clauses that are not applicable as a result of the estate tax repeal.

• A similar bill was introduced in the New Jersey Senate on May 20 to clarify the interpretation of certain formula clauses in Wills and trusts executed before 2010.
   

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

There have been a number of new developments related to federal and state level estate taxes over the past few months.

• House passes 10 year minimum term for GRATs. On March 24, 2010, the House passed the Small Business and Infrastructure Jobs Tax Act of 2010 which contains a provision instituting a 10 year minimum term for GRATs and a requirement that the remainder interest for GRATs be greater than zero. As we have detailed in prior blog posts, short term GRATs are an effective estate planning tool to transfer significant wealth to younger generations estate and gift tax free. If enacted into law, the use of GRATs will be severely limited. The bill now goes to the Senate for consideration. If you have been considering implementing a GRAT, you should move forward quickly before it is too late.
• NJ estate tax extended to non-residents? A bill was introduced on February 8, 2010 in New Jersey seeking to extend the New Jersey estate tax to non-residents who own real or tangible property in New Jersey. Currently, the New Jersey estate tax only applies to New Jersey residents.
• Florida estate tax on non-residents? Bills were filed in both the Florida House and Senate in February, 2010 to impose a Florida estate tax on non-residents who own real or personal property in Florida and who reside in states that tax Florida residents who own property in those states. If enacted, the law would be effective July 1, 2010.
• Federal estate tax repeal. We are three months into the one year estate tax repeal and there are no new significant developments. It remains pure speculation at this point whether the repeal will be replaced with a new estate tax law and if so, will the new law be retroactively applied so that the repeal is treated as if it never existed, or whether the repeal will run its course for 2010 and 2011 will bring a reinstated estate tax with much lower exemption amounts ($1 million federal exemption and generation-skipping transfer tax amounts).

We of course will be following all of these developments closely and will post updates if and when the status of the above matters change.
 

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

For the first time in almost 100 years, a federal estate tax does not exist.  On January 1, the federal estate and generation skipping transfer taxes were eliminated, but only for one year.  Click here to read about the current legislative uncertainty.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

The following letter was recently distributed to clients and friends of Cole Schotz:

Dear Clients and Friends:

Due to Congressional inaction in the final weeks of 2009, the Federal estate tax has been repealed for individuals dying in 2010 and the generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax has been repealed for generation-skipping transfers made in 2010. However, current law provides that the estate tax and GST tax will be restored as of January 1, 2011 with only a $1 million applicable exclusion and a $1 million GST exemption, indexed since 1998 for inflation, as compared to the $3.5 million applicable exclusion and GST tax exemption that had been in effect in 2009. The Federal gift tax remains in place (though at a lower tax rate) with a $1 million exemption and will not change except as to certain specialized trusts.

It was widely anticipated in the tax and estate planning community at large that Congress would take action before the end of 2009 to prevent this result. Therefore, virtually all tax professionals determined that it was unnecessary for clients to undertake a review of their estate planning documents prior to the end of 2009. Since Congress did not act, however, it is important for you to be aware of this situation which will likely be resolved in one of the following ways:

1. Congress could pass legislation which reinstates the estate tax and GST tax with specified exemption amounts that would be retroactive to January 1, 2010;
2. Congress could pass such legislation that would be effective as of a later date; or
3. Legislation will not be passed in 2010, in which case, there would be no estate or GST tax in effect until January 1, 2011, when those taxes would be reinstated with a top estate and GST tax rate of 55%, an applicable exclusion amount of $1 million and a GST exemption of $1 million, indexed since 1998 for inflation.

Of course, other scenarios are always possible as Congress’ action or inaction is impossible to predict. We will closely follow all discussions in Congress, review all proposed bills, and advise you when legislation has been enacted. We also will post updates to our tax blog (www.taxtrustsandestateslawmonitor.com) on these matters as they break.

While the prevailing view is that Congress will address these issues and retroactively restore the estate and GST taxes effective as of January 1, 2010, there is no guarantee that this will occur. Therefore, it is important that you are aware that the current state of the law, with repeal in place, could create unintended results as to how your assets will pass at the time of your death and could result in adverse tax consequences. Whether your particular situation is impacted and, if so, in what manner, depends on the particular wording in your Wills, Trusts and other estate planning documents and on your family and financial circumstances.

Examples of only a few of the situations that could produce unintended results include (i) an allocation of assets between the children of a current or prior marriage and a surviving spouse and (ii) an allocation of assets between children and grandchildren, where such allocations are based on tax concepts that were in effect when your Wills were executed but are no longer in effect under current law. In both of these cases, assets may be distributed in a way that you did not intend. The potential tax consequences that could result if the repeal stays in effect are literally too numerous to mention here, and must be explored on an individual basis.

Another change that applies only in 2010 relates to the tax basis of inherited assets. Under the law in effect prior to 2010 and again in 2011, the tax basis of inherited assets generally changes to the value of those assets on the date of the decedent’s death. Under the law now in effect, however, the basis in inherited assets remains the same with two limited exceptions: (i) up to a $1.3 million increase in basis will apply to assets passing to beneficiaries on a decedent’s death and (ii) up to an additional $3 million increase in basis will apply to assets passing to a surviving spouse.

Given that the potential tax and distribution impact could be significant, we suggest that you contact a member of our Tax, Trusts and Estate Department to review the effect of this change in law on your estate plan, whether or not we drafted your estate planning documents.

Best wishes for a happy and healthy new year.

Very truly yours,

Cole, Schotz, Meisel, Forman & Leonard, P.A.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

To the surprise of most estate planning practitioners, the arrival of January 1, 2010 brought with it a federal estate tax repeal. Congress was unable to compromise prior to year end on legislation that would have either maintained the status quo ($3.5 million applicable exclusion amount and a 45% estate tax rate) or implemented new exclusion amounts and/or tax rates.

As a result, the following rules apply in 2010:

• There is no federal estate tax;
• There is no generation-skipping-transfer (“GST”) tax;
• While the gift tax exclusion amount remains fixed at $1 million, the gift tax rate drops to 35%; and
• The basis step-up for inherited assets is eliminated. In its place, beneficiaries will inherit assets with the basis of the decedent (assuming the asset has appreciated). There are two exceptions: (i) there will be a $1.3 million increase in basis to assets passing to beneficiaries on a decedent’s death and (ii) there will be an additional $3 million increase in the basis of assets passing to the decedent’s surviving spouse.

The prevailing belief among estate planners is that Congress will act soon to re-institute the estate tax and make it retroactive to January 1, 2010. If Congress fails to act in 2010, the federal estate tax will be reinstated by law on January 1, 2011 with a $1 million applicable exclusion amount and a $1.2 million GST exclusion.

This is a brief summary of the major estate tax changes as a result of the repeal. We will be blogging frequently on this topic as developments unfold. Please also look for a letter we are mailing out to our clients and friends explaining some of our concerns regarding the repeal, a copy of which will be posted to the blog shortly.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link

On December 3, the House of Representatives by a vote of 225 to 200 passed an estate tax bill which makes the $3.5 million applicable exclusion amount and the 45% estate tax rate permanent. Every Republican, along with 26 Democrats, voted no on the bill. If a law is not passed by December 31, the estate tax will be repealed for one year, and in 2011, the estate tax will return with a $1 million exemption (subject to inflation) and a top estate tax rate of 55%. The Senate is not expected to adopt this bill; it is more likely to pass a one year extension of the current law. We will keep you posted on all developments as they unfold.

• Email This
• Print
• Comments
• Trackbacks
• Share Link