Important Inflation Adjustments in 2012 to Applicable Exclusion And GST Amounts

On October 20, 2011, the IRS released Revenue Procedure 2011-52, which announced inflation adjustments to the applicable exclusion amount beginning in 2012. For an estate of any decedent dying during calendar year 2012, the applicable exclusion is increased from $5 million to $5.12 million.  This change increases not only the applicable exclusion amount available at death, but also a taxpayer’s lifetime gift applicable exclusion amount and generation skipping transfer exclusion amount.

The $13,000 gift annual exclusion has not been increased.

Note that the present tax law provides that if there is no change in the law prior to December 31, 2012, the applicable exclusion will be reduced to $1 million, subject to inflationary adjustment.  Due to this potential decrease in the lifetime gift exclusion, now is the time to seriously consider gifting options before they are limited.

Other items of note that also are subject to inflationary adjustment in 2012 include the social security wage base, which increases from $106,800 in 2011 to $110,100 in 2012, and the maximum amount that can be deferred into a 401(k) from $16,500 to $17,00

Focus on State Estate Taxes

We were alerted by one of our blog readers last week to a Wall Street Journal editorial published on February 8 stating that, from an estate tax perspective, New Jersey is the worst state in which to die. The article explains that up to 54% of a New Jersey decedent’s wealth could be lost to estate taxes in 2011 (New York decedents would lose 45.4%). While we disagree with some of the factual assertions set forth in the article (including that the state death tax deduction is new in 2011 – it is not and has been in place since 2005), we agree with the larger point that state estate taxes should be a significant concern for New Jersey (and New York) taxpayers.

With the federal estate tax exemption at $5 million per person in 2011 and 2012, the margin between the New Jersey exemption ($675,000) and the New York exemption ($1 million) has widened appreciably. The consequence is that for married taxpayers who want to take advantage of the first spouse to die’s full federal exemption and pass $5 million to their beneficiaries (for example, to an exemption trust for the benefit of the surviving spouse and/or children), then without special planning, a New Jersey/New York estate tax of approximately $391,600 would be due. Parties must consider whether it is worthwhile to pay some state level estate tax in the first spouse to die’s estate, especially in light of the fact that beginning in 2011, a married decedent’s federal estate tax exemption is portable, meaning the surviving spouse can use the first spouse to die’s unused estate tax exemption amount.

A number of variables factor into the decision, including: (1) the size of the surviving spouse’s estate; (2) all appreciation of the assets owned in the exemption trust will pass free of federal and state estate taxes in the future; (3) the current law is in place for two years, and as a result, the federal exemption amount could be reduced and estate tax rates (currently 35%) could be increased; (4) the age of surviving spouse; and (5) future plans of the surviving spouse, who possibly could move to a state with no estate tax (ie, Florida).

All of these decisions lead to another point. Estate plans need to be drafted in a very flexible manner to enable different decisions to be made depending on each taxpayer’s individual circumstances. It is not appropriate in this tax environment to have an inflexible plan.
 

Gifts in 2010 as a Strategy to Reduce Your Estate

One of the lesser known components of the 2010 estate tax repeal is that the gift tax rate in 2010 is 35%, as opposed to the 45% gift and estate tax rate that was in place in 2009. This presents a planning opportunity for a taxpayer to reduce his taxable estate and save a significant amount of taxes if the taxpayer believes that his estate will be subject to an estate tax in the future.

Absent new legislation, the 2010 estate tax repeal will sunset in 2011, with the estate tax reinstituted at rates as high as 55% and an exclusion amount equal to $1 million (adjusted for inflation). Gifts in excess of $1 million also will be subject to gift tax at rates as high as 55%. Thus, gifting assets in 2010 at a lower rate will ultimately transfer significantly more wealth to a taxpayer’s beneficiaries.

Assume that a taxpayer desires to gift $10 million to his children and has used his lifetime gift exclusion. In 2010, the gift tax on this gift, payable at a 35% rate, would be $3.5 million. Taxpayer would pay the gift tax so the total outlay for the taxpayer to get $10 million to his beneficiaries would be equal to $13.5 million. Assuming that the taxpayer survives three years from the date of the gift, the amount of the gift tax paid will not be included in taxpayer’s estate.

Now assume that the same taxpayer does not make the gift in 2010, and dies with $13.5 million in his estate in a year where the maximum estate tax rate is 55% (and said taxpayer also has used his full exclusion amount). The amount of estate tax due on the $13.5 million included in the taxpayer’s estate would be approximately $7.5 million, leaving approximately $6 million to pass to the taxpayer’s beneficiaries. On these facts, the 2010 gift of $10 million increases the net amount passing to taxpayer’s beneficiaries by almost $4 million.

The lower gift tax rate combined with the fact that the gift tax paid is not subject to estate tax (assuming taxpayer survives three years from the date of the gift) can produce dramatic savings for taxpayers inclined to make gifts in 2010 and pay gift tax.

Even more dramatic savings can be achieved in 2010 if the taxpayer’s beneficiaries are grandchildren. Due to the fact that the generation-skipping transfer (“GST”) tax is repealed in 2010, a gift in 2010 to grandchildren will not trigger a GST tax. If the same taxpayer dies in future years leaving these assets to grandchildren, the assets will be subject to both estate tax and a significant GST tax (up to 55%), further diminishing the amount ultimately passing to grandchildren.

There are less than three months remaining (assuming no retroactive application of new gift and estate tax laws) to implement this planning.

A Look at the Current Muddled State of the Federal Estate Tax

For the first time in almost 100 years, a federal estate tax does not exist.  On January 1, the federal estate and generation skipping transfer taxes were eliminated, but only for one year.  Click here to read about the current legislative uncertainty.

House Passes Estate Tax Legislation

On December 3, the House of Representatives by a vote of 225 to 200 passed an estate tax bill which makes the $3.5 million applicable exclusion amount and the 45% estate tax rate permanent. Every Republican, along with 26 Democrats, voted no on the bill. If a law is not passed by December 31, the estate tax will be repealed for one year, and in 2011, the estate tax will return with a $1 million exemption (subject to inflation) and a top estate tax rate of 55%. The Senate is not expected to adopt this bill; it is more likely to pass a one year extension of the current law. We will keep you posted on all developments as they unfold.